Image

Featured Poll: Is There a Nuclear Future?

June 10, 2013
For almost a century the American utility paradigm was one of building large, base-loaded central generation. As a result coal and nuclear now provide over half of U.S. electric energy.

For almost a century the American utility paradigm was one of building large, base-loaded central generation. As a result coal and nuclear now provide over half of U.S. electric energy. But renewable generation, wind and solar, is growing at an exponential rate and intermittent resources don't play well with slow/non-rampable generation. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects a flat to slow growth of nuclear over the next 30 years, depending on gas prices. But they most probably haven't taken into consideration the increasing need for grid flexibility that nuclear can't provide

Then there are the environmental and safety issues surrounding both coal and nuclear and the falling natural gas prices…

About the Author

Paul Mauldin | Contributing Editor

Paul Mauldin has worked in the energy industry for more than 25 years, developing and implementing advanced energy technologies. As research director for Pacific Gas and Electric Co., he pioneered methodologies used in the design, maintenance and control of energy delivery systems. As a consultant, he has provided guidance to utilities and the vendor community, nationally and internationally. Mauldin holds BSEE and MSEE degrees from the University of California-Berkeley and is a registered professional engineer.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of T&D World, create an account today!

Latest from Grid Innovations

A model of an electrical substation. Net zero or real zero energy by 2050 has dramatic implications on the current planning, design, operations and maintenance of the electric transmission and distribution grid that delivers that energy. Photo 6794713 © Pavel Losevsky | Dreamstime.com